Dear Dr. Edemskiy,
According to the reports of two Reviewers, while one of them considers that your manuscript contains interesting results and suggests minor revisions, the other Reviewer suggests that major revisions are needed, with several main points to be considered and clarified before publication.
Please, consider every comment and corrections given by both Reviewers, and provide also a detailed answer to their report with a list of all the changes made in the revised version of your manuscript.
Kind regards and looking forward your revised manuscript,
Ana

Dear Dr. Edemskiy,
I have received now a new report of the reviewer.
I am pleased to inform you that your manuscript has now been accepted for publication in Annales Geophysicae, but subject to only one technical correction. Just in case I am repeating if below:

"Now (after revision) the paper deserves to be published due to some interesting results and discussion. Only one point should be considered by the authors in preparing their final manuscript.

1. Lines 111-112: Generally that means that there should be a clear trough between enhancement and the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA).
Do you mean trough between LTE and EIA southern crest? Please re-phrase."

Please, consider his comment, and provide also a detailed answer to his report with a list of all the changes made in the revised version of your manuscript.
Kind regards and looking forward your revised manuscript,
Ana

Dear Dr. Ilya Edemskiy,
I am pleased to inform you that the manuscript "Localized TEC enhancements in the Southern Hemisphere" has now been accepted for publication in Annales Geophysicae.
Thank you for considering our journal for the publication of your research.
Kind regards,
Ana Elias