Articles | Volume 37, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-763-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-763-2019
Comment/reply
 | 
29 Aug 2019
Comment/reply |  | 29 Aug 2019

Comment on “Cavitons and spontaneous hot flow anomalies in a hybrid-Vlasov global magnetospheric simulation” by Blanco-Cano et al. (2018)

Gábor Facskó

Related authors

In-flight calibration of the Hot Ion Analyser on board Cluster
A. Blagau, I. Dandouras, A. Barthe, S. Brunato, G. Facskó, and V. Constantinescu
Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 3, 49–58, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-3-49-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-3-49-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Subject: Magnetosphere & space plasma physics | Keywords: Bow shock and foreshock
Fine structure and motion of the bow shock and particle energisation mechanisms inferred from Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) observations
Krzysztof Stasiewicz and Zbigniew Kłos
Ann. Geophys., 40, 315–325, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-315-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-40-315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Foreshock cavitons and spontaneous hot flow anomalies: a statistical study with a global hybrid-Vlasov simulation
Vertti Tarvus, Lucile Turc, Markus Battarbee, Jonas Suni, Xóchitl Blanco-Cano, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Markku Alho, Maxime Dubart, Maxime Grandin, Andreas Johlander, Konstantinos Papadakis, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 39, 911–928, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-911-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-911-2021, 2021
Short summary
Evidence of the nonstationarity of the terrestrial bow shock from multi-spacecraft observations: methodology, results, and quantitative comparison with particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations
Christian Mazelle and Bertrand Lembège
Ann. Geophys., 39, 571–598, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-571-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-571-2021, 2021
Short summary
A deep insight into the ion foreshock with the help of test particle two-dimensional simulations
Philippe Savoini and Bertrand Lembège
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1217–1235, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1217-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1217-2020, 2020
Short summary
Helium in the Earth's foreshock: a global Vlasiator survey
Markus Battarbee, Xóchitl Blanco-Cano, Lucile Turc, Primož Kajdič, Andreas Johlander, Vertti Tarvus, Stephen Fuselier, Karlheinz Trattner, Markku Alho, Thiago Brito, Urs Ganse, Yann Pfau-Kempf, Mojtaba Akhavan-Tafti, Tomas Karlsson, Savvas Raptis, Maxime Dubart, Maxime Grandin, Jonas Suni, and Minna Palmroth
Ann. Geophys., 38, 1081–1099, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1081-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-38-1081-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Blanco-Cano, X., Battarbee, M., Turc, L., Dimmock, A. P., Kilpua, E. K. J., Hoilijoki, S., Ganse, U., Sibeck, D. G., Cassak, P. A., Fear, R. C., Jarvinen, R., Juusola, L., Pfau-Kempf, Y., Vainio, R., and Palmroth, M.: Cavitons and spontaneous hot flow anomalies in a hybrid-Vlasov global magnetospheric simulation, Ann. Geophys., 36, 1081–1097, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1081-2018, 2018. a
Facskó, G., Trotignon, J. G., Dandouras, I., Lucek, E. A., and Daly, P. W.: Study of hot flow anomalies using Cluster multi-spacecraft measurements, Adv. Space Res., 45, 541–552, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.08.011, 2010. a
Kecskeméty, K., Erdős, G., Facskó, G., Tátrallyay, M., Dandouras, I., Daly, P., and Kudela, K.: Distributions of suprathermal ions near hot flow anomalies observed by RAPID aboard Cluster, Adv. Space Res., 38, 1587–1594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.09.027, 2006. a
Lin, Y.: Global hybrid simulation of hot flow anomalies near the bow shock and in the magnetosheath, Planet. Space Sci., 50, 577–591, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(02)00037-5, 2002.  a
Omidi, N., Zhang, H., Sibeck, D., and Turner, D.: Spontaneous hot flow anomalies at quasi-parallel shocks: 2. Hybrid simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 173–180, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JA018099, 2013. a, b, c
Short summary
Blanco-Cano et al. (2018) intended to find a type of transient event in the solar wind before the terrestrial bow shock using a special type of simulation. However, the simulation results cannot reproduce the main features of the event. Based on the remarks described below, I am sure that the features in the simulations are not those types of events. The Vlasiator code simulated proto-SHFAs.