Journal cover Journal topic
Annales Geophysicae An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.585 IF 1.585
  • IF 5-year value: 1.698 IF 5-year
    1.698
  • CiteScore value: 1.62 CiteScore
    1.62
  • SNIP value: 0.820 SNIP 0.820
  • IPP value: 1.52 IPP 1.52
  • SJR value: 0.781 SJR 0.781
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 83 Scimago H
    index 83
  • h5-index value: 24 h5-index 24
ANGEO | Articles | Volume 37, issue 1
Ann. Geophys., 37, 25–36, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-25-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: Advanced Global Navigation Satellite Systems tropospheric...

Ann. Geophys., 37, 25–36, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-37-25-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Regular paper 15 Jan 2019

Regular paper | 15 Jan 2019

Comparisons between the WRF data assimilation and the GNSS tomography technique in retrieving 3-D wet refractivity fields in Hong Kong

Zhaohui Xiong et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,230 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,012 201 17 1,230 20 18
  • HTML: 1,012
  • PDF: 201
  • XML: 17
  • Total: 1,230
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 18
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jul 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Jul 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 1,056 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,042 with geography defined and 14 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 18 Oct 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
A comparison between the GNSS tomography technique and WRFDA in retrieving wet refractivity (WR) is conducted in HK during a wet period and a dry period. The results show that both of them can retrieve good WR. In most of the cases, the WRFDA output outperforms the tomographic WR, but the tomographic WR is better than the WRFDA output in the lower troposphere in the dry period. By assimilating better tomographic WR in the lower troposphere into the WRFDA, we slightly improve the retrieved WR.
A comparison between the GNSS tomography technique and WRFDA in retrieving wet refractivity (WR)...
Citation