Journal cover Journal topic
Annales Geophysicae An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.585 IF 1.585
  • IF 5-year value: 1.698 IF 5-year
    1.698
  • CiteScore value: 1.62 CiteScore
    1.62
  • SNIP value: 0.820 SNIP 0.820
  • IPP value: 1.52 IPP 1.52
  • SJR value: 0.781 SJR 0.781
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 83 Scimago H
    index 83
  • h5-index value: 24 h5-index 24
Volume 24, issue 4
Ann. Geophys., 24, 1189–1197, 2006
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-1189-2006
© Author(s) 2006. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: MaCWAVE

Ann. Geophys., 24, 1189–1197, 2006
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-1189-2006
© Author(s) 2006. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  03 Jul 2006

03 Jul 2006

The atmospheric background situation in northern Scandinavia during January/February 2003 in the context of the MaCWAVE campaign

U. Blum1,*, G. Baumgarten2, A. Schöch2, S. Kirkwood3, B. Naujokat4, and K. H. Fricke1 U. Blum et al.
  • 1Physikalisches Institut der Universität Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany
  • 2Leibniz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik e.V., 18225 Kühlungsborn, Germany
  • 3Institutet för rymdfysik, 98 128 Kiruna, Sweden
  • 4Meteorologisches Institut der Freien Universität Berlin, 12165 Berlin, Germany
  • *now at: Forsvarets forskningsinstitutt, 2027 Kjeller, Norway

Abstract. The atmosphere background wind field controls the propagation of gravity waves from the troposphere through the stratosphere into the mesosphere. During January 2003 the MaCWAVE campaign took place at Esrange, with the purpose of observing vertically ascending waves induced by orography. Temperature data from the U. Bonn lidar at Esrange (68° N/21° E) and the ALOMAR RMR lidar (69° N/16° E), wind data from Esrange MST radar ESRAD, as well as wind data from the ECMWF T106 model, are used to analyse the atmospheric background situation and its effect on mountain wave propagation during January/February 2003. Critical levels lead to dissipation of vertically ascending waves, thus mountain waves are not observable above those levels. In the first half of January a minor as well as a major stratospheric warming dominated the meteorological background situation. These warmings led to a wind reversal, thus to critical level filtering and consequently prevented gravity waves from propagating to high altitudes. While the troposphere was not transparent for stationary gravity waves most of the time, there was a period of eight days following the major warming with a transparent stratosphere, with conditions allowing gravity waves generated in the lower troposphere to penetrate the stratosphere up to the stratopause and sometimes even into the lower mesosphere. In the middle of February a minor stratospheric warming occurred, which again led to critical levels such that gravity waves were not able to ascend above the middle stratosphere. Due to the unfavourable troposphere and lower stratosphere conditions for gravity wave excitation and propagation, the source of the observed waves in the middle atmosphere is probably different from orography.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation