Journal cover Journal topic
Annales Geophysicae An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.585 IF 1.585
  • IF 5-year value: 1.698 IF 5-year
    1.698
  • CiteScore value: 1.62 CiteScore
    1.62
  • SNIP value: 0.820 SNIP 0.820
  • IPP value: 1.52 IPP 1.52
  • SJR value: 0.781 SJR 0.781
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 83 Scimago H
    index 83
  • h5-index value: 24 h5-index 24
Volume 15, issue 9
Ann. Geophys., 15, 1158–1164, 1997
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-997-1158-z
© European Geosciences Union 1997

Special issue: Wind Measurements

Ann. Geophys., 15, 1158–1164, 1997
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-997-1158-z
© European Geosciences Union 1997

  30 Sep 1997

30 Sep 1997

Zonal mean and tidal dynamics from space: an empirical examination of aliasing and sampling

J. M. Forbes1, M. Kilpatrick1, D. Fritts1, A. H. Manson2, and R. A. Vincent3 J. M. Forbes et al.
  • 1University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • 2University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
  • 3University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S. Australia

Abstract. Interpretations of space-based measurements of atmospheric parameters in the mesosphere and thermosphere are complicated by large local-time variations at these altitudes. For this reason, satellite orbits are often preferred which precess through all local times one or more times per season. However, the local-time structure of the atmosphere is inherently non-stationary, which can lead to sampling and aliasing difficulties when attempting to deconvolve the measurements into zonal mean and tidal components. In the present study, hourly radar measurements of mesopause-region winds are used to form a mock data base which can be used to gain insight into implications of the aforementioned problems; the use of actual measurements introduces a realistic element of geophysical temporal variability. Assuming zonal symmetry (i.e., migrating tides superimposed on a zonal mean circulation), the radar measurements are sampled from the satellite perspective for orbital inclinations of 57° and 70°, and compared to the ground or true perspective. These comparisons provide realistic estimates of the errors to be expected when attempting to derive mean and tidal components from space-based measurements. For both diurnal and semidiurnal components, and the quoted satellite inclinations, acceptable errors (3–4m/srms) are obtained for data covering 24h local time (i.e., ascending plus descending nodes); the corresponding errors for single-node data (12h local-time coverage) are of order 8–11m/s, and therefore may not represent reliable estimates of the actual tidal components. There exist certain caveats in connection with the latter conclusion which are discussed.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation