Contact Disclaimer
Annales Geophysicae
Copernicus.org Home EGU Copernicus Publications Copernicus Meetings
  Home  
  General Information  
  Submission  
  Special Issues  
  Evaluation  
  Production  
  Subscription  
  Online Library  
  Recent Papers  
  Volumes and Issues  
  Special Issues  
  Topical Library  
  Library Search  
  Title and Author Search  
  Volumes and Issues      Contents of Issue 7     
Ann. Geophys., 25, 1669-1690, 2007
www.ann-geophys.net/25/1669/2007/
© European Geosciences Union 2007


Motion of flux transfer events: a test of the Cooling model

R. C. Fear1, S. E. Milan1, A. N. Fazakerley2, C. J. Owen2, T. Asikainen3, M. G. G. T. Taylor4, E. A. Lucek5, H. Rème6, I. Dandouras6, and P. W. Daly7
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
2Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 6NT, UK
3Department of Physical Sciences, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, 90014, Finland
4Research and Scientific Support Department, European Space Agency, 2201AZ Noordwijk, The Netherlands
5Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2BZ, UK
6CESR/CNRS, 9 Avenue du Colonel Roche, B.P. 4346, 31028 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
7Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Max-Planck-Str. 2, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany

Abstract. The simple model of reconnected field line motion developed by Cooling et al. (2001) has been used in several recent case studies to explain the motion of flux transfer events across the magnetopause. We examine 213 FTEs observed by all four Cluster spacecraft under a variety of IMF conditions between November 2002 and June 2003, when the spacecraft tetrahedron separation was ~5000 km. Observed velocities were calculated from multi-spacecraft timing analysis, and compared with the velocities predicted by the Cooling model in order to check the validity of the model. After excluding three categories of FTEs (events with poorly defined velocities, a significant velocity component out of the magnetopause surface, or a scale size of less than 5000 km), we were left with a sample of 118 events. 78% of these events were consistent in both direction of motion and speed with one of the two model de Hoffmann-Teller (dHT) velocities calculated from the Cooling model (to within 30° and a factor of two in the speed). We also examined the plasma signatures of several magnetosheath FTEs; the electron signatures confirm the hemisphere of connection indicated by the model in most cases. This indicates that although the model is a simple one, it is a useful tool for identifying the source regions of FTEs.

Full Article in PDF (2803 KB)
  Library Search ANGEO  
       
  Special Services  
  Printer-friendly Version  
  Bookmark  
  Download Acrobat Reader  
  News  
  ISI Impact Factor: 1.427 (2007)
 
Annales Geophysicae is launching a new section: AnGeo Communicates
 
© Copernicus 2004–2006