Contact Disclaimer
Annales Geophysicae
Copernicus.org Home EGU Copernicus Publications Copernicus Meetings
  Home  
  General Information  
  Submission  
  Special Issues  
  Evaluation  
  Production  
  Subscription  
  Online Library  
  Recent Papers  
  Volumes and Issues  
  Special Issues  
  Topical Library  
  Library Search  
  Title and Author Search  
  Volumes and Issues      Contents of Issue 11     
Ann. Geophys., 24, 3099-3113, 2006
www.ann-geophys.net/24/3099/2006/
© European Geosciences Union 2006


Implications of unusual pitch-angle distributions observed by ISEE-1 and 2

C. A. Zuluaga, E. S. Beiser, J. Chen, and T. A. Fritz
Center for Space Physics, Boston University, Boston MA, USA

Abstract. Unusual energetic particle pitch angle distributions (PADs) were observed by the ISEE-1 and 2 satellites at 3 h MLT and a radial distance of about 10–15 RE during the time period of 07:00-14:00 UT on 3 March 1979. The ISEE-1 satellite obtained complete 3-D distributions of energetic proton and electron fluxes as a function of energy, while ISEE-2 was configured to provide higher time resolution but less angular resolution than ISEE-1. The ISEE-1 observed a butterfly PAD (a minimum in the 90° PA particle flux) for a period of about 2 h (10:00–12:00 UT) for the electrons, and 3 h (09:00–12:00 UT) for the protons over an energy range of 22.5–189 keV (E1–E4) for the electrons and 24–142 keV (P1–P4) for the protons. The small pitch angle (15°, 30°) charged particles (electrons and protons) are seen to behave collectively in all four energy ranges. The relative differences in electron fluxes between 15° PA and 90° PA are more significant for higher energy channels during the butterfly PAD period. Three different types of electron PADs (butterfly, isotropic, and peaked-at-90°) were observed at the same location and time as a function of energy for a short period of time before 10:00 UT. Electron butterfly distributions were also observed by the ISEE-2 for about 1.5 h over 28–62 keV (E2–E4), although less well resolved than ISEE-1. Unlike the ISEE-1, no butterfly distributions were resolved in the ISEE-2 proton PADs due to less angular resolution. The measured drift effects by ISEE-1 suggest that the detected protons were much closer to the particle source than the electrons along their trajectories, and thus ruled out a nightside source within 18:00 MLT to 03:00 MLT. Compared to 07:30 UT, the charged particle fluxes measured by ISEE-1 were enhanced by up to three orders of magnitude during the period 08:30–12:00 UT. From 09:10:00 UT to 11:50 UT, the geomagnetic conditions were quiet (AE<100 nT), the LANL geosynchronous satellites observed no substorms, and the local magnetic field measured by ISEE-1 was almost constant, while the small PA charged particle (both electron and proton) fluxes measured by ISEE-1 increased gradually, which implies a particle source other than the substorm source. Based on detailed particle trajectory tracings in a realistic geomagnetic field model, the 50–200 keV protons with small PA at 10:00 UT ISEE-1 location on 3 March 1979 were passing through the northern high-altitude and high-latitude morningside region where the cusp should be located under a dawnward IMF component condition, while those protons with large PA may connect to the high-latitude morningside magnetopause. It is possible that the cusp source is responsible for the all particles observed during the event.

Full Article in PDF (2233 KB)
  Library Search ANGEO  
       
  Special Services  
  Printer-friendly Version  
  Bookmark  
  Download Acrobat Reader  
  News  
  ISI Impact Factor: 1.427 (2007)
 
Annales Geophysicae is launching a new section: AnGeo Communicates
 
© Copernicus 2004–2006