Contact Disclaimer
Annales Geophysicae
Copernicus.org Home EGU Copernicus Publications Copernicus Meetings
  Home  
  General Information  
  Submission  
  Special Issues  
  Evaluation  
  Production  
  Subscription  
  Online Library  
  Recent Papers  
  Volumes and Issues  
  Special Issues  
  Topical Library  
  Library Search  
  Title and Author Search  
  Volumes and Issues      Contents of Issue 3     
Ann. Geophys., 23, 745-751, 2005
www.ann-geophys.net/23/745/2005/
© European Geosciences Union 2005


The effects of the pre-reversal ExB drift, the EIA asymmetry, and magnetic activity on the equatorial spread F during solar maximum

C.-C. Lee1, J.-Y. Liu2, B. W. Reinisch3, W.-S. Chen2, and F.-D. Chu2,4
1General Education Center, Ching-Yun University, No. 229, Chienshin Road, Jhongli City, Taoyuan County 320, Taiwan
2Institute of Space Science, National Central University, No. 300, Jhongda Rd., Jhongli City, Taoyuan County 320, Taiwan
3Center for Atmospheric Research, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 600 Suffolk Street, Lowell, MA 01854, USA0, Taiwan
4National Standard Time and Frequency Laboratory, Telecommunication Laboratories, No. 12 Lane 551 Ming-Tsu Road Sec. 5, Yang-Mei 326, Taiwan

Abstract. We use a digisonde at Jicamarca and a chain of GPS receivers on the west side of South America to investigate the effects of the pre-reversal enhancement (PRE) in ExB drift, the asymmetry (Ia) of equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA), and the magnetic activity (Kp) on the generation of equatorial spread F (ESF). Results show that the ESF appears frequently in summer (November, December, January, and February) and equinoctial (March, April, September, and October) months, but rarely in winter (May, June, July, and August) months. The seasonal variation in the ESF is associated with those in the PRE ExB drift and Ia. The larger ExB drift (>20m/s) and smaller |Ia| (<0.3) in summer and equinoctial months provide a preferable condition to development the ESF. Conversely, the smaller ExB drift and larger |Ia| are responsible for the lower ESF occurrence in winter months. Regarding the effects of magnetic activity, the ESF occurrence decreases with increasing Kp in the equinoctial and winter months, but not in the summer months. Furthermore, the larger and smaller ExB drifts are presented under the quiet (Kp<3) and disturbed (Kp≥3) conditions, respectively. These results indicate that the suppression in ESF and the decrease in ExB drifts are mainly caused by the decrease in the eastward electric field.

Full Article in PDF (2722 KB)
  Library Search ANGEO  
       
  Special Services  
  Printer-friendly Version  
  Bookmark  
  Download Acrobat Reader  
  News  
  ISI Impact Factor: 1.427 (2007)
 
Annales Geophysicae is launching a new section: AnGeo Communicates
 
© Copernicus 2004–2006