Contact Disclaimer
Annales Geophysicae
Copernicus.org Home EGU Copernicus Publications Copernicus Meetings
  Home  
  General Information  
  Submission  
  Special Issues  
  Evaluation  
  Production  
  Subscription  
  Online Library  
  Recent Papers  
  Volumes and Issues  
  Special Issues  
  Topical Library  
  Library Search  
  Title and Author Search  
  Volumes and Issues      Contents of Issue 9      Special Issue     
Ann. Geophys., 23, 2975-2982, 2005
www.ann-geophys.net/23/2975/2005/
© European Geosciences Union 2005


Fluxes of energetic protons and electrons measured on board the Oersted satellite

J. Cabrera1, M. Cyamukungu1, P. Stauning3, A. Leonov1,2, P. Leleux1, J. Lemaire1, and G. GrĂ©goire1
1Center for Space Radiations (CSR), Chemin du cyclotron 2, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
2Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute (MEPHI), Kashirskoe Shosse 31, 115 409 Moscow, Russia
3Danish Meteorological Institute (DMI), Lyngbyveij 100, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract. The Charged Particle Detector (CPD) on board the Oersted satellite (649 km perigee, 865 km apogee and 96.48° inclination) currently measures energetic protons and electrons. The measured peak fluxes of E>1 MeV electrons are found to confirm the predictions of AE8-MAX, though they occur at a geographical position relatively shifted in the SAA. The fluxes of protons are one order of magnitude higher than the predictions of AP8-MAX in the energy range 20-500 MeV. This huge discrepancy between AP8 and recent measurements in LEO was already noticed and modelled in SAMPEX/PSB97 and TPM-1 models. Nevertheless some other LEO measurements such as PROBA and CORONA-F result in flux values in good agreement with AP8 within a factor 2. The anisotropy of the low-altitude proton flux, combined with measurement performed on board three-axis stabilised satellites, has been suspected to be one possible source of the important discrepancies observed by different missions. In this paper, we evaluate the effect of anisotropy on flux measurements conducted using the CPD instruments. On the basis of the available data, we confirm the inaccuracy of AP8 at LEO and suggest methods to improve the analysis of data in future flux measurements of energetic protons at low altitudes.

Full Article in PDF (646 KB)
  Library Search ANGEO  
       
  Special Services  
  Printer-friendly Version  
  Bookmark  
  Download Acrobat Reader  
  News  
  ISI Impact Factor: 1.427 (2007)
 
Annales Geophysicae is launching a new section: AnGeo Communicates
 
© Copernicus 2004–2006