Contact Disclaimer
Annales Geophysicae
Copernicus.org Home EGU Copernicus Publications Copernicus Meetings
  Home  
  General Information  
  Submission  
  Special Issues  
  Evaluation  
  Production  
  Subscription  
  Online Library  
  Recent Papers  
  Volumes and Issues  
  Special Issues  
  Topical Library  
  Library Search  
  Title and Author Search  
  Volumes and Issues      Contents of Issue 8      Special Issue     
Ann. Geophys., 23, 2915-2920, 2005
www.ann-geophys.net/23/2915/2005/
© European Geosciences Union 2005


Cluster and Double Star observations of dipolarization

R. Nakamura1, W. Baumjohann1, T. L. Zhang1, C. M. Carr2, A. Balogh2, K-H. Fornacon3, E. Georgescu4, H. Rème5, I. Dandouras5, T. Takada1, M. Volwerk1,4, Y. Asano1, A. Runov1, H. Eichelberger1, B. Klecker4, C. Mouikis6, L. M. Kistler6, and O. Amm7
1Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, 8042 Graz, Austria
2Space and Atmospheric Phys. Group, Blackett Lab., Imperial College, London SW72BZ, UK
3Inst. für Geophysik und Extraterrestrische Physik, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38 106 Braunschweig, Germany
4Max-Planck Inst. für extraterrestrische Physik, 85 748 Garching, Germany
5Centre d’Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements, 31 028 Toulouse, Cedex 4, France
6Space Science Center, Science and Engineering Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
7Finnish Meteorological Institute, Space Research, 00 101 Helsinki, Finland

Abstract. We studied two types of dipolarization events with different IMF conditions when Cluster and Double Star (TC-1) were located in the same local time sector: 7 August 2004, 18:00-24:00 UT, during a disturbed southward/northward IMF interval, and 14 August 2004, 21:00-24:00 UT, when the IMF was stably northward. Cluster observed dipolarization as well as fast flows during both intervals, but this was not the case for TC-1. For both events the satellites crossed near the conjugate location of the MIRACLE stations. By using multi-point analysis techniques, the direction/speed of the propagation is determined using Cluster and is then compared with the disturbances at TC-1 to discuss its spatial/temporal scale. The propagation direction of the BZ disturbance at Cluster was mainly dawnward with a tailward component for 7 August and with a significant Earthward component for 14 August associated with fast flows. We suggest that the role of the midtail fast flows can be quite different in the dissipation process depending on the condition of the IMF and resultant configuration of the tail.

Full Article in PDF (1390 KB)
  Library Search ANGEO  
       
  Special Services  
  Printer-friendly Version  
  Bookmark  
  Download Acrobat Reader  
  News  
  ISI Impact Factor: 1.427 (2007)
 
Annales Geophysicae is launching a new section: AnGeo Communicates
 
© Copernicus 2004–2006