Contact Disclaimer
Annales Geophysicae
Copernicus.org Home EGU Copernicus Publications Copernicus Meetings
  Home  
  General Information  
  Submission  
  Special Issues  
  Evaluation  
  Production  
  Subscription  
  Online Library  
  Recent Papers  
  Volumes and Issues  
  Special Issues  
  Topical Library  
  Library Search  
  Title and Author Search  
  Volumes and Issues      Contents of Issue 1      Special Issue     
Ann. Geophys., 23, 163-181, 2005
www.ann-geophys.net/23/163/2005/
© European Geosciences Union 2005


Observations of the April 2002 geomagnetic storm by the global network of incoherent scatter radars

L. P. Goncharenko1, J. E. Salah1, A. van Eyken2, V. Howells3, J. P. Thayer4, V. I. Taran5, B. Shpynev6, Q. Zhou7, and J. Chau8
1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Haystack Observatory, Westford, MA, USA
2EISCAT Scientific Association, PO Box 432, Longyearbyen, Norway
3Space Physics Division, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, Oxon, UK
4University of Colorado, Aerospace Engineering Sciences Boulder, CO, USA
5Institute for Ionosphere, Kharkov, Ukraine
6Institute for Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Irkutsk, Russia
7Electrical and Computer Eng. Dept., Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA
8Radio Observatorio de Jicamarca, Instituto Geofisico del Peru, Lima 33, Peru

Abstract. This paper describes the ionospheric response to a geomagnetic storm beginning on 17 April 2002. We present the measurements of ionospheric parameters in the F-region obtained by the network of eight incoherent scatter radars. The main effects of this storm include a deep decrease in the electron density observed at high and middle latitudes in the pre-noon sector, and a minor enhancement in the density observed in the daytime sector at middle latitudes. Extreme plasma heating (>1000-3000 K) is observed at high latitudes, subsiding to 200-300K at subauroral latitudes. The western hemisphere radar chain observed the prompt penetration of the electric field from auroral to equatorial latitudes, as well as the daytime enhancement of plasma drift parallel to the magnetic field line, which is related to the enhancement in the equatorward winds. We suggest that in the first several hours after the storm onset, a negative phase above Millstone Hill (pre-noon sector) results from counteracting processes - penetration electric field, meridional wind, and electrodynamic heating, with electrodynamic heating being the dominant mechanism. At the lower latitude in the pre-noon sector (Arecibo and Jicamarca), the penetration electric field becomes more important, leading to a negative storm phase over Arecibo. In contrast, in the afternoon sector at mid-latitudes (Kharkov, Irkutsk), effects of penetration electric field and meridional wind do not counteract, but add up, leading to a small (~15%), positive storm phase over these locations. As the storm develops, Millstone Hill and Irkutsk mid-latitude radars observe further depletion of electron density due to the changes in the neutral composition.

Full Article in PDF (2534 KB)
  Library Search ANGEO  
       
  Special Services  
  Printer-friendly Version  
  Bookmark  
  Download Acrobat Reader  
  News  
  ISI Impact Factor: 1.427 (2007)
 
Annales Geophysicae is launching a new section: AnGeo Communicates
 
© Copernicus 2004–2006