Contact Disclaimer
Annales Geophysicae
Copernicus.org Home EGU Copernicus Publications Copernicus Meetings
  Home  
  General Information  
  Submission  
  Special Issues  
  Evaluation  
  Production  
  Subscription  
  Online Library  
  Recent Papers  
  Volumes and Issues  
  Special Issues  
  Topical Library  
  Library Search  
  Title and Author Search  
  Volumes and Issues      Contents of Issue 10     
Ann. Geophys., 22, 3707-3719, 2004
www.ann-geophys.net/22/3707/2004/
© European Geosciences Union 2004


Cluster observations of a complex high-altitude cusp passage during highly variable IMF

M. G. G. T. Taylor1,2, M. W. Dunlop3, B. Lavraud1,4, A. Vontrat-Reberac5, C. J. Owen2, P. Décréau6, P. Trávnícek7, R. C. Elphic1, R. H. W. Friedel1, J. P. Dewhurst2, Y. Wang1, A. Fazakerley2, A. Balogh8, H. Rème4, and P. W. Daly9
1Space and Atmospheric Sciences, Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, USA
2Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, UK
3Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK
4Centre d’Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements, Toulouse, France
5Centre d’étude des Environnements Terrestre et Planétaires, Velizy, France
6LPCE/CNRS 45071 Orleans Cedex 2, France
7Institute of Atmospheric Physics, The Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
8Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, London, UK
9Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie, D-37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany Republic

Abstract. On 26 February 2001, the Cluster spacecraft were outbound over the Northern Hemisphere, at approximately 12:00 MLT, approaching the magnetosheath through the high-altitude (and exterior) cusp region. Due to macroscopic motions of the cusp, the spacecraft made multiple entries into the exterior cusp region before exiting into the magnetosheath, presenting an excellent opportunity to utilize the four spacecraft techniques available to the Cluster mission. We present and compare 2 methods of 4-spacecraft boundary analysis, one using PEACE data and one using FGM data. The comparison shows reasonable agreement between the techniques, as well as the expected "single spacecraft" plasma and magnetic signatures when associated with propagated IMF conditions. However, during periods of highly radial IMF (predominantly negative BX GSM), the 4-spacecraft boundary analysis reveals a dynamic and deformed cusp morphology.

Full Article in PDF (3519 KB)
  Library Search ANGEO  
       
  Special Services  
  Printer-friendly Version  
  Bookmark  
  Download Acrobat Reader  
  News  
  ISI Impact Factor: 1.427 (2007)
 
Annales Geophysicae is launching a new section: AnGeo Communicates
 
© Copernicus 2004–2006