Contact Disclaimer
Annales Geophysicae
Copernicus.org Home EGU Copernicus Publications Copernicus Meetings
  Home  
  General Information  
  Submission  
  Special Issues  
  Evaluation  
  Production  
  Subscription  
  Online Library  
  Recent Papers  
  Volumes and Issues  
  Special Issues  
  Topical Library  
  Library Search  
  Title and Author Search  
  Volumes and Issues      Contents of Issue 12     
Ann. Geophys., 21, 2271-2280, 2003
www.ann-geophys.net/21/2271/2003/
© European Geosciences Union 2003


A substorm in midnight auroral precipitation

V. G. Vorobjev1, O. I. Yagodkina1, G. V. Starkov1, and Ya. I. Feldstein2
1Polar Geophysical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Apatity, Murmansk region, 184200, Russia
2IZMIRAN, Russian Academy of Sciences, Troitsk, Moscow region, 142190, Russia

Abstract. DMSP F7 spacecraft observations for the whole of 1986 were used to construct the empirical model of the midnight auroral precipitation during a substorm. The model includes the dynamics of different auroral precipitation boundaries and simultaneous changes in average electron precipitation energy and energy flux in different precipitation regions during all substorm phases, as well as the IMF and solar wind plasma signatures during a substorm. The analysis of the model shows a few important features of precipitation. (1) During the magnetic quietness and just before the beginning of the substorm expansive phase the latitudinal width of the auroral precipitation in the nightside sector is about 5 – 6° CGL, while that of the auroral oval is about 2 – 3° CGL during such periods. (2) For about 5 min before the substorm onset a decrease in the average precipitating electron energy in the equatorward part of auroral zone was observed simultaneously, with an increase in both the average electron energy and energy flux of electron precipitation in the poleward part of the auroral zone. (3) The isotropy boundary position in the beginning of the substorm expansive phase coincides well with the inner edge of the central plasma sheet. The analysis of interplanetary medium parameters shows that, on average, during the substorm development, the solar wind dynamic pressure was about 1.5 times that of the magnetic quietness period. Substorms occurred predominantly during the southward IMF orientation, suggesting that substorm onset often was not associated with the northern turn or decrease in the southward interplanetary Bz . The Northern Hemisphere’s substorms occurred generally during the positive interplanetary By in winter, and they were observed when the interplanetary By was negative in summer.

Key words. Ionosphere (auroral ionosphere; particle precipitation) – Magnetospheric physics (storm and substorm; magnetosphere-ionosphere interaction)


Full Article in PDF (222 KB)
  Library Search ANGEO  
       
  Special Services  
  Printer-friendly Version  
  Bookmark  
  Download Acrobat Reader  
  News  
  ISI Impact Factor: 1.427 (2007)
 
Annales Geophysicae is launching a new section: AnGeo Communicates
 
© Copernicus 2004–2006