Volumes and Issues  Contents of Issue 9  Special Issue

Ann. Geophys., 15, 1123-1141, 1997
www.ann-geophys.net/15/1123/1997/
© European Geosciences Union 1997

An intercomparison between the GSWM, UARS, and ground based radar observations: a case-study in January 1993

S. E. Palo¹, M. E. Hagan¹, C. E. Meek², R. A. Vincent³, M. D. Burrage⁴, C. McLandress⁵, S. J. Franke⁶, W. E. Ward⁵, R. R. Clark⁷, P. Hoffmann⁸, R. Johnson⁴, D. Kürschner⁹, A. H. Manson², D. Murphy¹⁰, T. Nakamura¹¹, Y. I. Portnyagin¹², J. E. Salah¹³, R. Schminder⁹, W. Singer⁸, T. Tsuda¹¹, T. S. Virdi¹⁴, and Q. Zhou^15
1National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
²University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
³University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
⁴University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
⁵York University, Toronto, Canada
⁶University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA
⁷University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
⁸Institut für Atmosphärenphysik, Kühlungsborn, Germany
⁹Leipzig University, Collm, Germany
¹⁰Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Australia
¹¹Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
¹²Institute of Experimental Meteorology, Obninsk, Russia
¹³Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Westford, MA, USA
¹⁴The University College of Wales, Aberystwyth, UK
¹⁵Arecibo Observatory, Arecibo, Puerto Ricoyth, UK

Abstract. The Global-Scale Wave Model (GSWM) is a steady-state two-dimensional linearized model capable of simulating the solar tides and planetary waves. In an effort to understand the capabilities and limitations of the GSWM throughout the upper mesosphere and thermosphere a comparative analysis with observational data is presented. A majority of the observational data used in this study was collected during the World Day campaign which ran from 20 January to 30 January 1993. During this campaign data from 18 ground-based observational sites across the globe and two instruments located on the UARS spacecraft were analyzed. Comparisons of these data with the simulations from the GSWM indicate that the GSWM results are in reasonable agreement with the observations. However, there are a number of cases where the agreement is not particularly good. One such instance is for the semidiurnal tide in the northern hemisphere, where the GSWM estimates may exceed observations by 50% . Through a number of numerical simulations, it appears that this discrepancy may be due to the eddy diffusivity profiles used by the GSWM. Other differences relating to the diurnal tide and the quasi-two-day wave are presented and discussed. Additionally, a discussion on the biases and aliasing difficulties which may arise in the observational data is also presented.

Full Article (PDF, 881 KB)

Citation: Palo, S. E., Hagan, M. E., Meek, C. E., Vincent, R. A., Burrage, M. D., McLandress, C., Franke, S. J., Ward, W. E., Clark, R. R., Hoffmann, P., Johnson, R., Kürschner, D., Manson, A. H., Murphy, D., Nakamura, T., Portnyagin, Y. I., Salah, J. E., Schminder, R., Singer, W., Tsuda, T., Virdi, T. S., and Zhou, Q.: An intercomparison between the GSWM, UARS, and ground based radar observations: a case-study in January 1993, Ann. Geophys., 15, 1123-1141, 1997.   Bibtex   EndNote   Reference Manager