Contact Disclaimer
Annales Geophysicae
Copernicus.org Home EGU Copernicus Publications Copernicus Meetings
  Home  
  General Information  
  Submission  
  Special Issues  
  Evaluation  
  Production  
  Subscription  
  Online Library  
  Recent Papers  
  Volumes and Issues  
  Special Issues  
  Topical Library  
  Library Search  
  Title and Author Search  
  Volumes and Issues      Contents of Issue 12      Special Issue     
Ann. Geophys., 14, 1297-1304, 1996
www.ann-geophys.net/14/1297/1996/
© European Geosciences Union 1996


Auroral ionospheric conductivities: a comparison between experiment and modeling, and theoretical f10.7-dependent model for EISCAT and ESR

J. Lilensten1, P. L. Blelly2, W. Kofman1, and D. Alcaydé2
1CEPHAG-ENSIEG, BP 46, 38402 Saint Martin d'Hères Cedex, France
2CESR, 9 Avenue Claude Roche, 31029 Toulouse Cedex, France

Abstract. Several authors have published models of auroral conductances in the past. Some of them are based on theoretical approaches; others are the result of observations. The data bases for the latter models range from 8 h to 3 years of experiments. In this paper, we show the results of our own modeling, based on a coupled ki- netic/fluid approach. We compare these results to the sta- tistical model based on 3 years of experiment. We then model the auroral ionospheric conductances above EISCAT and the EISCAT-Svalbard Radar for different solar-activity indices. These modeled conductances are fitted with a simple law depending on the f10.7 index and on the solar zenith angle.

Full Article in PDF (352 KB)
  Library Search ANGEO  
       
  Special Services  
  Printer-friendly Version  
  Bookmark  
  Download Acrobat Reader  
  News  
  ISI Impact Factor: 1.427 (2007)
 
Annales Geophysicae is launching a new section: AnGeo Communicates
 
© Copernicus 2004–2006